Computer Law And Law Of Evidence Criminology Essay

Computer offense is on the addition as there are many users of the cyberspace and social-networking sites. Measure the extent to which relevant statute law has intended to function as a hindrance to such offenses.

Since the launch of the computing machines in the mid 1970 ‘s, they have played a major function in today ‘s society as it is impossible to populate without a computing machine as most of us are so dependent on them. Computers is used in a figure ways such as booking a flight, purchasing insurance, reading the intelligence, pass oning with other people. Another ground people use a computing machine is to perpetrate offenses.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Computer offense has risen at an dismaying rate as people think they can be undetected and be anon. . This is because it is easier to perpetrate a offense in the cyber universe than in the existent universe. When a offense is committed in the existent universe, physical grounds is ever left behind such as blood and fingerprints. In the cyber universe there is n’t any physical grounds. The idea of their paths would non be traced, nevertheless they are mistaken as tracking down an IP reference has become easy to track doing it difficult for felons to remain unseeable while they are on-line. An IP reference is short for internet protocol reference and this identifies a computing machine on web. The IP references are based on the webs that use the TCP/IP protocol. Assorted activities are committed by non merely by felons but ordinary people as good. These activities would dwell of offenses linked to child erotica such as downloading images, stealing individualities, choping to other history to derive information for the 3rd party, making a virus and money frauds are known to go easier by the usage of computing machines. Credit card Numberss, personal Idaho information can besides be targeted by programmed automated package. Peoples commit these offenses as they have a bang of taking advantage of a computing machine system hypertext transfer protocol: //www.ehow.com,2012, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.webopedia.com,2012

Distributed Denial of Service ( DDoS ) is a common signifier of onslaught on computing machines. This procedure involves felons can hold controlled entree to multiple computing machines and utilize them to assail a figure of marks or one mark. Another signifier of onslaught is malicious package ( malware ) . This consists of package that allows condemnable to hold full control of a system and leting the malware Godhead to make whatever they want. The malware can be a figure of things such as a virus, worm, Trojan, adware, spyware and a root kit. A virus is the most serious signifier of onslaught. This consists the virus impacting the computing machine or other electronic devices that are passed by other user activity e.g. an email fond regard being opened. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.seas.ucla.edu/2011, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.webopedia.com/2013

As computing machine offense has risen, the cost of cyber offense is besides a menace to the authorities and the state. Harmonizing to the Cabinet office, cyber offense in the UK costs ?27bn a twelvemonth. These costs are made up of ?21bn to concerns ; which is more than the offices one-year budget, ?2.2bn to the authorities and ?3.1bn to public. Baroness Neville-Jones the Security curate stated in a briefing “ the authorities was determined to work with industry to undertake cyber offense ” . “ At the minute, cyber felons are fearless because they do non believe they will be caught ” hypertext transfer protocol: //www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2011

The Police and Justice act 2006 is an act of parliament in the UK. Part 5 of the act – the assorted subdivision under chapter 48 introduced the Computer Misuse Act 1990 ( CMA ) . The Computer Misuse Act 1990 ( CMA ) was passed in 1990 and is portion of the UK Parliament. The rule of the act to is frame statute law and controls any activity linked to computing machine offense and cyberspace fraud. The act was introduced to cover with issues that have occurred by the abuse of computing machines. The act are based on three offenses that cover ‘Unauthorized entree to computing machine stuff ‘ ‘unauthorised entree to a computing machine with purpose to perpetrate or ease the committee or a farther offense ‘ and ‘unauthorised alteration of computing machine stuff ‘ hypertext transfer protocol: //www.cps.gov.uk.2013

The first act ‘Unauthorised entree to computing machine stuff ‘ even though there is n’t any physical harm, it ‘s an offense when a individual is found guilty of utilizing any computing machine stuff without permission which makes it illegal. An illustration of this would be the instance of R v Astrid Curzon. Curzon 49 was found guilty of deriving entree to a schools electronic mail system. She gained entree from her place and hence found private electronic mails from the caput instructor to staff members. The electronic mail contained treatments about employment of other staff members. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk2012

Another illustration of this would be the instance of DPP V Bignell [ 1998 ] . Two police officers already had entree to the constabulary national computing machine ( PNC ) that is merely used for constabulary intents. The brace asked the computing machine operator who used to the computing machine to obtain information from the DVLA through the constabulary national computing machine without cognizing it was for their ain pleasance intents. The divisional tribunal had stated that the two constabularies officers did n’t perpetrate a offense under subdivision 1 Unauthorized entree to computing machine stuff. the divisional tribunal believe that the two constabulary officers did n’t perpetrate a offense and their decisions were right, as the determination was n’t over ruled by the House of Lords in Bignell, The House of Lord ‘s had stated the followers: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.cps.gov.uk.2013

“ It was a possible position of the facts that the function of the officers in Bignell had simply been to bespeak another to obtain information by utilizing the computing machine. The computing machine operator did non transcend his authorization. His authorization permitted him to entree the information on the computing machine for the intent of reacting to petitions made to him in proper signifier by constabulary officers. No offense had been committed under subdivision 1 of the CMA. ” hypertext transfer protocol: //www.cps.gov.uk.2013

In a more recent article in the Daily Mail online ( PUBLISHED: 05:00, 17 December 2012 ) Hollywood stars Scarlett Johansson, Mila Kunis and Christina Aguilera computing machine was hacked by Christopher Chaney 36, was arrested for wiretapping and unauthorized entree when he hacked into their email histories. He managed to derive entree by utilizing Google and so utilizing the “ one got forgot my watchword ” button. He tried a figure of combinations of names and so he reset history watchwords by happening favored names, where they were born, and the name of their schools. The most serious incident when Chaney posted bare exposure of Johansson and her so conserve all over the internet hypertext transfer protocol: //www.dailymail.co.uk/2012

The 2nd act unauthorized entree to a computing machine with purpose to perpetrate or ease the committee or a farther offense ‘ as stated in the first act no existent physical harm to the computing machine stuff. Using the system without permission would do it illegal and perpetrating a on the system would be illegal excessively. This act chiefly covers actions such as utilizing email contents for blackmail. An illustration of these would be the instance of R v Delamare [ 2003 ] the suspect was working in bank and was offered ?100 to utilize the Bankss computing machine systems to derive information of other bank inside informations. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.stjohnsbuildings.com2013

The 3rd act unauthorized alteration of computing machine stuff an illustration of this act would be the instance of R v Pavel Cyganok and Ilja Zakrevski [ 2012 ] . ( published 2 July 2012 Last updated at 11:23 2 July ) Cyganok and Zakrevski were arrested and convicted of engineering high-tech offenses. The brace used a SpyEye Trojan to obtain login inside informations for on-line histories. The stolen information was so uploaded to waiters which the brace had entree to. ?100,000 of the stolen money was stolen and laundered through on-line histories leting felons to entree hypertext transfer protocol: //www.bbc.co.uk2012

The Acts of the Apostless are associated with punishments for both persons and groups of people that are portion of a pack. The punishments can be terrible for transgressing the three offenses. The punishments are varied based on what act have been breached. Each of the offenses are divided into drumhead punishments – a trail without a jury and an indictment penalties – a trail with a jury.

In the first act if the person was found guilty the drumhead strong belief in England and Wales the prison sentence would be a term of 12 months or a all right up to the statutory upper limit ( ?5000 ) or both. On a strong belief, the prison sentence would be of two old ages that should n’t be exceeded or a all right or both. In the 2nd act, the drumhead strong belief is a prison sentence of 6 months or a all right that is non allowed to be exceeded the statutory upper limit or both. On a strong belief, the prison sentence would be term of five old ages or a all right or both. In the 3rd act, if the person was found guilty the drumhead strong belief would be prison sentence of one twelvemonth or a all right that is non allowed to be exceeded the statutory upper limit or both. On a strong belief, the prison sentence would be 10 old ages or a all right or both. hypertext transfer protocol: //legal.practitioner.com2012

Section 35 of the Police and Justice 2006 had amended the Computer abuse act 1990. The amended act looks at new offenses which offences 1 and 2 are now combined together into a new offense. A new offense was added into the act 3a offense. This affect took topographic point on 1st October 2008. The three new offenses are as follows: Unauthorized entree to computing machine stuffs ( choping ) , Transporting out unauthorized Acts of the Apostless in relation to a computing machine and Making, providing or obtaining articles for usage in computing machine abuse offenses. The punishments were besides added to the new offenses. The constabulary and justness act increased the punishments for the first offense unauthorized entree to computing machine stuff. hypertext transfer protocol: //impact.freethcartwright.com/2006

The computing machine abuse act can be compared to other Torahs and statute laws. The Computer Crime Act ( CCA ) was passed in 1997 is an act of the Malayan authorities introduced the legal model to ease the growing of ICT systems called Cyber Torahs of Malaysia. The act was given a Royal Assent on June 18, 1997 but did n’t come into force on June 1, 2000. This act was introduced intent of protecting consumers and people that provide a service. The act besides protects on-line concerns and proprietors of rational belongings. The act was designed to halt offenses as computing machines are misused in a figure of ways, as this was added to other bing condemnable statute law. The Computer Crime Act and the Computer Misuse Act do hold a figure of similarities in the instance of the three offenses ; nevertheless it differs in more ways. As the Computer Misuse Act as the three offenses, the computing machine offense act looks at a wider scope of offenses. The CCA looks at the apprehension of computing machines, the computing machine web, end product, computing machine informations and the maps it uses. The act looks at computing machine plans and premises. The definition of a computing machine in CCA is summarised as any electronic devices that are programmable and has the ability to hive away informations. hypertext transfer protocol: //cybercrimes09.blogspot.co.uk/2009

The CCA looks at more terrible punishments compared to the CMA. For the first offense, ‘unauthorised entree to computing machine stuff ‘ the Malayan jurisprudence provinces that if the person were found guilty the prison sentence would be a maximal sentence that should n’t be exceeded five old ages and or a mulct of non transcending RM 50,000 ( ?10,273,45 ) for the 2nd offense, the Malayan jurisprudence provinces for the offense of ‘unauthorised entree with purpose to perpetrate or ease committee of farther offenses ‘ if the person were found guilty the prison sentence would be a maximal sentence ten old ages that should n’t be exceeded and or a all right non transcending RM 150,000 ( ?30,820,35 ) . For the 3rd offense ‘unauthorized alteration of the contents of any computing machine ‘ the Malayan jurisprudence provinces that if the person was found guilty the prison sentence would be non transcending seven old ages and or a all right non transcending RM 100,000 ( ?20, 546, 90 ) On a apt prison sentence non transcending ten old ages if the act was deliberately broken and or a all right non transcending RM 150,000, which is the equivalent to ( ?30, 820, 35 ) hypertext transfer protocol: //cybercrimes09.blogspot.co.uk/2009

The computing machine abuse act can besides compared to the American jurisprudence the Computer fraud and maltreatment act 1986. The act was passed by the united Congress. The act is a federal statute law that is aimed to curtail computing machine offenses that semen under the federal jurisdiction.the whole intent of the act was to beef up, widen, and clear up to protect computing machine systems from hooliganism. The act besides includes the use of virus and plans that have been intended to destruct a computing machine system. The jurisprudence prevents ‘the unauthorised entree of any computing machine system ‘ and ‘the obtention of classified authorities information ‘ . hypertext transfer protocol: //ecommerce.hostip.info.2013

Comparing to The Computer Misuse Act and The Computer Crime Act ( CCA ) 1997, the Computer fraud and maltreatment act 1986 has more terrible punishments. If the person were guilty of physical harm to a computing machine system, the prison sentence would be a term of 20 old ages that should n’t be exceeded and the all right making $ 250000 ( ?155,870.00 ) . Under this jurisprudence, Prosecutors are challenged to turn out that the suspect deliberately caused amendss to a computing machine. The other Acts of the Apostless are non so terrible than this act. hypertext transfer protocol: //ecommerce.hostip.info.2013

Even though the computing machine abuse act is in topographic point, the act still does non halt felons from perpetrating an offense. In the BBc intelligence online ( 4 July 2011 Last updated at 19:24 ) The offenses are committed as people want to derive information and sell to a 3rd party. In 2011 it was reported back in 2002 the News of the World newspaper had hacked in to Milly Dowler mobile phone and had listened to the voice mails and so deleted the messages. Subsequently the intelligence of the universe was forced to close down the paper after the choping dirt as they had admitted interfering with adolescent ‘s phone. The victim ‘s household and friends said it gave them false hope that she was still alive and Milly had deleted the messages herself. By the clip the messages were deleted. By this clip, the adolescent was already murdered. The hacking was classed as an improper interception of communications. This comes under Section 1 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.bbc.co.uk/2012

In an article in the Daily Mail online, ( PUBLISHED: 02:08, 9 June 2012 ) 11,000 people are believed to hunted by the constabulary for utilizing a service of a cyber-crime packs website that offered false designation and tips on how to perpetrate a offense. The pack had cloned a figure the individualities of people who a high recognition evaluation. Pay slips bank statements, passports and driving licences was besides sold to the packs ‘ members. The web site besides offered other services such as different grades of entree as the users where trusted to utilize the web site. One of the services included a Pt profile that cost ?5,500 that came with instructions on how to perpetrate individuality fraud. For ?2,000, Confidential Access ( CA ) offered a 100 % Creditmaster profile, which was sole to ‘VIP ‘ members of the web site. The web site was claimed to deserving be ?200million and had a turnover of ?11m between 2004 and 2008. The paying clients paid from around ?50 for a public-service corporation measure to ?800 for a set of three old ages ‘ professionally sealed. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.dailymail.co.uk/2012

Detective Inspector Tim Dowdeswell said:

‘This was a sophisticated operation which has netted 1000000s of lbs over the old ages. These cyber felons non merely provided the tools to perpetrate fraud, they instructed their clients in how to utilize them to do the maximal sum of money, whilst destroying existent people ‘s recognition histories into the deal. We have already brought many of their pupils in offense to tribunal and will go on to work with other constabulary forces and spouses to convey those people who bought and used these individualities in their ain frauds to justness. ‘ hypertext transfer protocol: //www.dailymail.co.uk/2012

Reasoning this essay, computing machine offense will still be on the addition. Crimes will be committed depending what the motive is such as greed and enjoyable demand. The Computer abuse act 1990 has a figure of defects as it failed in the instance of DPP V Bignell [ 1998 ] as the prosecuting officer felt that no offense was committed under subdivision 1 of authorized entree. The constabulary national computing machine ( PNC ) was used when a constabulary officer obtained information for their ain enjoyable demands, even though constabulary officers had entree to the PNC. The Computer abuse act 1990 should non hold failed, as the constabulary national computing machine should be used for patroling merely. Another manner it can neglect is the beginning of the offense such as the IP reference and hackers would happen ways and utilize another IP reference to avoid them acquiring caught.

I do believe that the computing machine abuse act can work as a hindrance, as it has a high cognition that undertakings any computing machine system that involves accusing activities. The act helps to maintain people safe and their personal information safe excessively.

My positions on the Computer abuse act 1990 that their penalty should be terrible as the Computer fraud and maltreatment act 1986. I say this because I feel with a rough penalty people will larn their lesson on non to perpetrate a offense. If an person served a 12 month prison sentence with a little mulct, they would be tempted to perpetrate another offense as they would experience that their penalty was non rough plenty.

My recommendations would be that the Computer abuse act 1990 should hold harsher penalties fiting up to the punishments of the Computer Misuse Act and the Computer Crime Act ( CCA ) 1997. I besides believe that the authorities should hold more power over the persons who commit offense as 27bn was wasted on computing machine offenses. I besides i believe that the act should at other facets and non concentrating on three subdivisions. If prosecuting officers are covering with computing machine offense instances, they themselves should hold an apprehension of the act and non let any longer instances to be dismissed.

Mentions

BBC News – News of the World ‘hacked Milly Dowler phone ‘ . 2013. BBC News – News of the World ‘hacked Milly Dowler phone ‘ . [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14017661. [ Accessed 29 December 2012 ] .

Cyber-criminal fraud pack who lived munificent life styles jailed for multi-million lb ID cozenage | Mail Online. 2013. Cyber-criminal fraud pack who lived munificent life styles jailed for multi-million lb ID cozenage | Mail Online. [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2156724/Cyber-criminal-fraud-gang-lived-lavish-lifestyles-jailed-multi-million-pound-ID-scam.html. [ Accessed 19 December 2012 ]

Christopher Chaney: Computer hacker who leaked bare exposures of Scarlett Johansson is sentenced to 10 old ages in prison | Mail Online. 2013. Christopher Chaney: Computer hacker who leaked bare exposures of Scarlett Johansson is sentenced to 10 old ages in prison | Mail Online. [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2249693/Christopher-Chaney-Computer-hacker-leaked-nude-photos-Scarlett-Johansson-sentenced-10-years-prison.html. [ Accessed 20 December 2012 ]

The cost of cyber offense | Cabinet Office. 2011. The cost of cyber offense | Cabinet Office. [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/resource-library/cost-of-cyber-crime. [ Accessed 19 December 2012 ]

Bobby Stocks 2013. Why Do Peoples Commit Computer Crimes? | eHow.com. [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.ehow.com/about_4709031_do-people-commit-computer-crimes.html. [ Accessed 19 December 2012 ]

What is IP reference? An IT Definition From Webopedia.com. 2013. What is IP reference? An IT Definition From Webopedia.com. [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.webopedia.com/TERM/I/IP_address.html. [ Accessed 20 December 2012 ]

Malicious Software. 2011 Malicious Software. [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.seas.ucla.edu/security/malware.html. [ Accessed 20 December 2012 ]

What is DDoS ( Distributed Denial of Service ) onslaught? – A Word Definition From the Webopedia Computer Dictionary. 2013. What is DDoS ( Distributed Denial of Service ) onslaught? – A Word Definition From the Webopedia Computer Dictionary. [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.webopedia.com/TERM/D/DDoS_attack.html. [ Accessed 20 December 2012 ]

Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of ( 1986 ) – Information, Law, System, and Damage. 2013. Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of ( 1986 ) – Information, Law, System, and Damage. [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //ecommerce.hostip.info/pages/248/Computer-Fraud-Abuse-Act-1986.html. [ Accessed 21 December 2012 ]

Cybercrimes: Computer Crime Act 1997. 2009. Cybercrimes: Computer Crime Act 1997. [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //cybercrimes09.blogspot.co.uk/2009/10/computer-crime-act-1997.html. [ Accessed 10 January 2013 ] .

Computer Misuse Act 1990: non yet in force: Legal Guidance: The Crown Prosecution Service. 2013. Computer Misuse Act 1990: non yet in force: Legal Guidance: The Crown Prosecution Service. [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.cps.gov.uk/legal/a_to_c/computer_misuse_act_1990/ # an07. [ Accessed 10 January 2013 ] .

IMPACTA® : The amended Computer Misuse Act: IMPACT steer to the necessities. 2006 IMPACTA® : The amended Computer Misuse Act: IMPACT steer to the necessities. [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //impact.freethcartwright.com/2006/11/a_while_ago_we_.html. [ Accessed 10 January 2013 ] .

Former beauty queen spied on headteacher ‘s electronic mail ( From Swindon Advertiser ) . 2012. Former beauty queen spied on headteacher ‘s electronic mail ( From Swindon Advertiser ) . [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/local/9881311.Former_beauty_queen_spied_on_headteacher_s_email/ . [ Accessed 10 January 2013 ] .

Computer Frauds – Unauthorised Access + Intent + Modification. 2012. Computer Frauds – Unauthorised Access + Intent + Modification. [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //legal.practitioner.com/regulation/standards_9_3_22.htm. [ Accessed 10 January 2013 ] .

BBC News – Online bank robbers face gaol clip for e-crimes. 2012. BBC News – Online bank robbers face gaol clip for e-crimes. [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18672068. [ Accessed 10 January 2013 ] .

INTERNET & A ; COMPUTER CRIME. 2013.. [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.stjohnsbuildings.com/resources/s/n/4/ComputerCrimeNotes.pdf. [ Accessed 10 January 2013 ] .