Organizational psychology Essay

I’m likely to be motivated most by personal growing factors. This is apprehensible for a individual who seeks personal fulfilment and development. I’m accomplishment oriented and have a penchant for an interesting and ambitious occupation. However. all other factors pertinent to work environment are besides of import to me. There are several formal theories of motive that aid me to increase my ain productiveness and actuate my co-workers.

The two-factor theory divides factors that affect employee public presentation and productiveness into two wide classs. viz. motivation factors ( embracing factors related to satisfaction and work content ) and hygiene factors ( those related to dissatisfaction and work conditions ) . The focal point in the organisation should be on heightening employee motive to the extent that it provides chances for ( a ) accomplishment. ( B ) acknowledgment. ( degree Celsius ) duty. ( vitamin D ) promotion. and ( vitamin E ) growing in competency.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Harmonizing to the two-factor theoretical account. both ‘satisfiers’ and ‘dissatisfiers’ are of value to a individual that ranks factors related to the content of work ( e. g. acknowledgment and opportunities to progress ) every bit high as factors related to work conditions ( e. g. friendly colleagues and flexible agenda ) . For me. wages and acknowledgment are less of import than the nature of a occupation. Material demands are less of import for me than personal satisfaction or clients’ blessing. The most applicable theory in my instance is Goal Setting Theory.

Goal Setting Theory is the most critically acclaimed theory of motive. It argues that persons are motivated to accomplish ends they set. and the strength of their motive depends on end specificity. end trouble. and committedness and feedback. Other chairing factors include self-efficacy of an employee and undertaking complexness. My perceptual experience of trouble of accomplishing a end might be excessively subjective and my trust on feedback might be less than by other employees. yet I’m really result-driven and challenged by complex yet interesting undertakings.

My motive is influenced by the trouble of ends ( such as guaranting high client satisfaction evaluations on large undertakings were there are many stakeholders ) . yet goals’ value ( exhilaration from working on a specific type of undertaking presenting good consequences instead than hard currency inflow ) is more of import. My higher-ups have recognized that it is of import to give me freedom in taking undertakings I’m motivated to work on and let me to put my ain aims and public presentation steps. My high grasp of liberty and power besides suggest that I am more effectual as an person worker than a squad participant.

This is yet another ground why Goal Setting Theory is appropriate for my motive: it has been argued that workers with higher self-efficacy are more effectual in personal end scene and fulfilment. However. this does non intend that I don’t value squad spirit as a agency of actuating my colleagues. Our company’s slogan is ‘Let’s Build Something Together. ’ Therefore. promoting teamwork is one of the ways to increase motive and productiveness. Our direction succeeded in assemblage and developing an outstanding crew by using several of import rules of group work direction which I besides follow.

I foster group coherence by a assortment of methods and believed that sound readying. self-importance less teamwork. and original strategizing are the built-in constituents of success. In my position. the accent should hold been on squad public presentation instead than single public presentation. Peoples. direction. and psychological science are three of import facets of teamwork. The accent on uninterrupted larning makes it possible to remain in front. When accomplishments and cognition of all group members combine in a manner that exceeds the amount of cognition of all single members. the synergy consequence can be observed. i. . the system as a whole has certain qualities its elements do non hold.

Therefore. it is of paramount importance to pay attentive to group coherence so that exceeding consequences can be achieved with limited human resources available in each organisation. Group determination doing agencies non merely working to accomplish better solutions but besides promote growing of community and trust. Group determination doing ensures much higher degree of member satisfaction and motive. Greater committedness is besides among of import advantages of group determination devising.

Open. collaborative atmosphere ensures part from all degrees and no domination. bullying or judgement from the foreman. Engagement in job resolution additions credence ; some even argue that a lower-quality solution that has broad credence can be more effectual than a higher-quality solution that lacks credence. It’s possible to reason that I’m motivated by complex yet interesting undertakings. while teamwork and group determination devising are the tools I use to actuate others.