Introduction Good eventide. thank you for ask foring me here this eventide. I would wish to discourse how Carmel Bird’s non-fiction book The Stolen Children-Their Stories ( TSC ) and Oodgeroo Noonuccal’s verse form. “We are going” ( WAG ) gives us an apprehension of how Australian voices reflect Australian values. Both texts explore the unjust intervention and effects of enduring inflicted upon Aboriginal communities and persons by past government’s policies. every bit good as western society’s discourtesy and ignorance. By analyzing the texts. we learn about the values of equalitarianism from the positions of both autochthonal people and the authorities.
Egalitarianism means a just spell for all people where everyone is equal in cardinal worth and position. Geting this sort of penetration into societal and political issues of assimilation alterations the position on jobs of equality in this state. It reveals we should hold sense of duty towards Aboriginal people and supply justness for their agony. Body Carmel bird’s position Carmel Bird organised the study in a simplified non-fiction text signifier for regular Australians to be able to detect how the past government’s policy profoundly affected the civilization. individuality and lives of Autochthonal people.
The composer used persuasive text to convey different emotional narratives and positions to convert the readers of her subjective point of position. One of the textual characteristics is the order of the texts. The texts start from the positions of the Aborigines who were affected. positioning respondents to experience understanding for them. And by seting the address of John Howard about avoiding apologizing to these people at the terminal makes him look unsympathetic. This farther reinforces Bird’s effort to convert Australians to portion her perceptual experience of accepting Autochthonal people as peers and work towards rapprochement.
Cover of the book Bird starts with her debut by discoursing the front screen of the book. The exposure depicts six Aboriginal orphan girls with props like playthings in their custodies to pull “prospective parents” by doing them look guiltless. In my sentiment. this seems barbarous as these misss were “no more than a commodity” for the authorities to utilize. And I don’t think I am the lone 1 who feels this manner. It evokes strong disfavor towards the authorities. particularly if the audience are parents who have kids. Imagine how awful it would be if it was your kid that was on the screen?
Bird voices this unfavorable judgment of the important voice of the authorities. who tried to extinguish a whole race of people “by decoloring Aboriginality from Australian society” as “a policy of systematic genocide” . She says the government’s manner to incorporate Autochthonal people into western society was an act of calculated race murder as they tried to pass over out a whole race by stealing their kids and subjecting them into opprobrious Foster places. The editor often uses 2nd pronoun ‘you’ to link with the reader. “when you read the stories… you will get down to cognize and experience how life has been” .
And by making this she lets us conceive of what the Aboriginal kids have experienced and understand their sense of disaffection of non belonging to any civilization. John Howard’s address On the other manus. John Howard’s address represents the voice of the authorities at the clip on the issue of rapprochement and apology. His position on the affair was to carry the populace into believing the current authorities was non responsible for the “hideous crimes” committed to the Autochthonal people. He believed that the current authorities should non be held accountable for the past government’s actions. He said “immensely proud” to show how proud he is of the 200 old ages of accomplishment to concentrate on the positives instead than the negatives.
And the negatives were downplayed as a euphemism “blemish” to stamp down the importance of stolen kids. This was to carry the populace to travel on from the yesteryear and travel frontward with the hereafter. John Howard’s stance on apologizing to Aboriginals was “no” . And alternatively of stating “sorry” he said “I feel really deep sorrow…” to avoid apologising because he was afraid that the authorities may go responsible for paying compensation to Aboriginal people one time they pursued tribunal action. This shows the withdrawal from sense of duty from the societal unfairness caused to autochthonal people based on economic grounds.
We are traveling ‘We Are Going’ by Oodgeroo Noonuccal represents a community of an Aboriginal folk. who experienced mistreatment by the white society merely like the narratives in TSC. But unlike TSC. the verse form reveals the societal unfairness through positions of an Aboriginal folk alternatively of from person who is non an Aboriginal like Carmel Bird. This adds to the issue of societal unfairness for the respondent by doing emotions experienced by the folk more echt when the cultural individualities of Oodgeroo’s people were taken off by Europeans during the invasion on the poet’s sacred land. Oodgeroo uses sole pronouns such as “they” and “theirs” to separate the differences between civilizations.
Affectional tone towards ‘white men’ shows what the folk felt when they did non esteem the tribe’s sacred land and construct a park. indicated by the mark that says ‘Rubbish May Be Tipped Here’ . How would you experience if person barged into your pace where you spend clip with your household and bent with your friends. topographic points a mark that says ‘Rubbish May Be Tipped Here’ . You would experience the same defeat the composer’s tribes people did. Wouldn’t you? This is why the poet loathes western people as she describes them “hurry about like ants” .
The usage of simile describes the negative tone of how small the Aboriginal folk thinks of white people. It reinforces the narratives in TSC because the narratives besides tell the effects of how white people’s actions profoundly affected their jobs such as loss of individuality. Decision In the terminal. texts I discussed uncover the dark side of Australian history through the narratives related to the loss and agonies of Aboriginal community caused by non-indigenous Australians. who invaded their land and inflicted more hurting by past government’s policies.
Carmel Bird’s edited ‘Bringing Them Home’ study in a non-fiction signifier for Australian citizens to hold with her point of position on the assimilation policy through the stolen children’s voices. She achieved her intent to help the readers in deriving penetration on the voices we heard and sympathise for the victims besides understand their positions. By carrying the audience to hold with her position of understanding Aborigines lets us to eventually accept Autochthonal people as peers and work towards rapprochement. By reflecting on the construct of equalitarianism. I gained more insight into sophisticated complexnesss of Australian values including equal right and societal justness.